Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mei Hasegawa vs Prathiba Narayan Prasad Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hasegawa vs Prasad analysis and find out who is favored!
Mei Hasegawa vs Prathiba Narayan Prasad Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Hasegawa 1 - 0 Prasad
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hasegawa has won 38.85% of points on his second serve, while Prasad has won 33.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hasegawa, in recent form, has won 53.98% of his opponent's second serve points, while Prasad has won 47.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.87% and 11.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hasegawa has saved 63.77% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Prasad has saved 40% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hasegawa has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 16/ 20), with Prasad winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hasegawa has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 30/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6). Prasad has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Hasegawa has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.1% of matches (W/L 8/ 13), where as Prasad has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hasegawa winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hasegawa winning 2 and Prasad winning 0. The last match between Hasegawa and Prasad was at the W35 Indore, 11-03-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Mei Hasegawa getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hasegawa and Prasad have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hasegawa winning 0 times and Prasad 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hasegawa winning 0, and Prasad 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hasegawa has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.22 while Prasad has played against players with an average rank of 157.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hasegawa has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Prasad has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hasegawa has converted 45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Prasad has converted 20% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hasegawa 1 - 0 Prasad
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
41% (34-48)
Career Total W/L
35% (14-26)
33% (2-4)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mei Hasegawa | Prathiba Narayan Prasad |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:0 | 1:6:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 46% (21/46) | 38% (21/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (18/21) | 43% (9/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 37% (13/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 61% (34/56) | 39% (18/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Mei Hasegawa
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mei Hasegawa | Prathiba Narayan Prasad |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (2/4) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (5/8) | 29% (2/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (62/66) | 34% (21/40) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.4 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:10 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 309.67 | 209.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (193/314) | 45% (44/97) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (119/193) | 41% (18/44) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 39% (47/121) | 34% (18/53) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (20/45) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (163/341) | 30% (22/74) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Mei Hasegawa Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Mei Hasegawa
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mei Hasegawa
Player
Mana Ayukawa
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Koshiishi
Player
Mei Hasegawa
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mei Hasegawa
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lakshmi Gowda
Player
Mei Hasegawa
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
8
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
51%
(
40 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
73
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabel Pascual Montalvo
Player
Mei Hasegawa
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
-
Aces
-
9
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Carolann Delaunay
Player
Mei Hasegawa
42%
(
28 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylah Preston
Player
Mei Hasegawa
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
21 of
35)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Prathiba Narayan Prasad Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Mei Hasegawa
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
21 of
56)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 2-6 6-3 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
54%
(
15 of
28)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
51
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aunchisa Chanta
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
9
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nadine Keller
Player
Prathiba Narayan Prasad
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
8
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Hasegawa Vs Prasad Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
